Legal Opinion

Graham v. Chubb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Chubb sued Graham upon a promissory note for $58.88, dated March 6, 1871, but payable with interest at ten per cent per annum from the previous 21st of September, 1866. Defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of set-off, and denied the execution of the note. The ground of denial appeared to have been that he claimed the clause extending the interest back to 1866 was not in the note when given. The items of set-off included a sum of $74.71, paid on the note in 1873, and various articles furnished in subsequent years. On the trial a sufficient amount of set-off was proved to give…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Behrens v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Segelke & Kohlhaus Manufacturing Co. v. VincentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Starr v. Baldwin Piano Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Adams v. NoelMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Spillman v. Security State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API