Vincent v. Defield
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien. (O'Hara, J.) Summary proceedings to recover the possession of land. Defendant brings error. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
Defendant was a tenant under complainant. His lease expired April 30, 1892, but at the expiration of his term he refused to surrender possession, and complainant, on May 2, 1892, commenced this proceeding to oust defendant. It appears that, before the expiration ■of the term, complainant had entered into a lease of the premises to one E. for a term which was to commence May 1, 1892; and the sole contention is that complainant, by reason of the agreement with E., had not the right to possession when these proceedings were instituted.
E. held a contract for possession of the premises. By the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McGuffie v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sloan v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Herpolsheimer v. ChristopherNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Snider v. DebanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Hammond v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Board of Education v. AstlerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.