Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. State, Department of Transportation

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1974Published

1DissentBrock, Justice

I must respectfully dissent.

Although the majority opinion recognizes the injustice of the decision in Tillman v. Lewisburg & N. Railroad Co., 133 Tenn. 554, 182 S.W. 597 (1915), it nevertheless applies the rule there announced that “unity of title” must exist in order for the citizen to recover incidental or consequential damages to the property remaining after the taking of a contiguous tract in which the citizen has an ownership interest as a tenant in common. The property taken is the parking lot for a motel located on the property not taken but which is contiguous to that taken and with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Tillman v. Lewisburg & Northern RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Garland v. Holston Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API