Legal Opinion

Nehls v. Walker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1932No. 41544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, C. J.

— The appellant is the owner of an undivided 6/45ths interest in a 160-acre tract of land in Mahaska county. The title to the remaining 39/45th is in- the heirs of Magdalene Heitsman, deceased, whose estate is in process of administration. The interest of appellant was obtained by purchase from the beneficiaries-of the will of J:. G. Heitsman and is not involved in the estate of Magdalene and is not liable for the debts of her estate. Prior to the commencement of this action, the administrator of the Magdalene Heitsman estate had been authorizéd and directed by the court to sell the 39/45ths…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Mullinnix v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Branscomb v. GillianSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  4. Porter v. WingertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. Rice v. RiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Russell L. Newhall v. Marcia Elaine Newhall RollSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Spies v. PrybilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Murphy v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Amended March 13, 2017 Russell L. Newhall v. Marcia Elaine Newhall RollSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. Russell L. Newhall v. Marcia Elaine Newhall RollCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API