Legal Opinion

Lutherville Supply & Equipment Co. v. Dimon

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1963No. [No. 356, September Term, 1962.]PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

A judge of the Circuit Court for Baltimore County sustained a demurrer to appellant’s amended bill of complaint, which sought, inter alia, to set aside a deed to a husband and wife as in defraud of creditors, and it has appealed.

The bill alleged that: appellant is a Maryland corporation; the appellee, Harry F. Dimon, was one of its employees and over a period of time became its debtor. In one instance, he purchased goods and services for his personal use (totaling some $960.30), and, with appellant’s consent, charged these items to it, with the understanding that he would repay the amounts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simon v. SorrentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Ressmeyer v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Westminster Savings Bank v. SaubleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Englander v. JacobyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  5. Manning v. CarruthersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Running v. WiddesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pearce v. MickaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API