Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Feinberg v. Boros

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 11, 2012Published

1ConcurrenceMoskowitz, J.

This appeal requires us to consider whether a postarbitration agreement that eliminates the rights of nonparties to assert collateral estoppel would have been enforceable. Because the doctrine of law of the case is applicable, but exceptional circumstances exist involving policy considerations underlying postarbitration limiting agreements, including the opportunity for collusion, the potential agreement between plaintiff and his former business partner would not have been enforceable.

This dispute arises largely from an arbitration that occurred in the late 1990’s between plaintiff and his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vandenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Matter of Am. Ins. Co (Messinger)New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Tenzer, Greenblatt, Fallon & Kaplan v. Capri Jewelry, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. 191 Chrystie LLC v. LedouxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Welch Foods, Inc. v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API