Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. OHM v. Perkins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 4, 1935No. 53PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This writ of habeas corpus brings into question the legality of the appellant’s order of deportation. The writ was dismissed below. He was ordered deported because he was found to be an alien and a member of the Communist Party, an organization or group which believes in, advises, and advocates the overthrow by force or violence of the government of the United States, or of all forms of law. If it be the fact, the appellant may be legally deported. Kjar v. Doak, 61 F.(2d) 566 (C. C. A. 7); Berkman v. Tillinghast, 58 F.(2d) 621 (C. C. A. 1); Wolck v. Weedin, 58 F.(2d) 928 (C. C. A. 9); United…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Wolck v. WeedinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  3. Kjar v. DoakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  4. United States v. Lee HuenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1902
  5. United States Ex Rel. Yokinen v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Weekes v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Grow v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co. v. KrugCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
  5. Moore Oil, Inc. v. SnakardDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API