Legal Opinion

Leiden v. Leiden

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided August 31, 2004No. 2003-CA-00024-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIDGES, P.J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. Matthew Alan Leiden filed a request for modification of child support in the Chancery Court of Scott County and his ex-wife Kelly responded and filed a counter suit for non-payment of child support and alimony. The trial court denied Matthew’s motion and entered judgment in Kelly’s favor for the unpaid alimony. Aggrieved, Matthew asserts the following issue on appeal:

I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING APPELLANT’S CLÁIM FOR MODIFICATION OF ' CHILD SUPPORT.

112. Finding no error, we affirm.

*584FACTS

¶ 3. Matthew and Kelly Leiden were heretofore husband and wife.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tilley v. TilleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Reddell v. ReddellMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bank of Mississippi v. HollingsworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cumberland v. CumberlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Varner v. VarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Irving v. IrvingMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  2. McNair v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  3. James Craig Irving v. Johnnie Evans IrvingMississippi Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API