Application of Walter Seifried and Ludwig Klenk
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the Patent Office Board of Appeals decision affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, all of the claims in appellants’ application, 1 as unpatentable over Goldman et al., 2 taken alone, or in view of either Winter 3 or Panconis et al., 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a heat-shrinkable, seamless polyethylene terephthalate tubular foil, as well as the process for its manufacture, and is reflected in appealed claims 1 through 4 which read:
1. A process for the manufacture of shrinkable, seamless tubular foils of polyethylene…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Application of Fritz UhligCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967