Legal Opinion

Van Doozer v. Van Doozer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINSLOW, J. (Pro Tempore)

This suit was commenced by appellant (the wife) against respondent to procure a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The respondent, after admitting the formal parts of the complaint, denied the allegations thereof regarding mistreatment, denied that appellant herself had faithfully performed her marriage contract and likewise denied that appellant was a fit and proper person to be awarded the exclusive care, control and custody of their minor child, Gerald Franklyn Van Doozer.

The parties were married on the 4th day of May, 1940. At the time of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merges v. MergesOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Henry v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hughes v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. McKissick v. McKissickOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Sachs v. SachsOregon Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McFadden v. McFaddenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Shrout v. ShroutOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Cripe v. CripeOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Richardson v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API