Legal Opinion

Palmer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1929No. H-224PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This case involves the question of the allowance of amortization of war facilities as a deduction against gross income under section 234 (a) (8)1 of the revenue act of 1918, 40 Stat. 1057, 1077.

*652There is no dispute about the amount of amortization allowable to the plaintiff under the facts. The amount allowed was as follows:

1918_$251,725.72

1919_ 2, 681.47

The net taxable income of the Racine Auto Tire Company for the year 1918 as adjusted without the benefit of the amortization deduction was $160,281.76. This income, as will be seen, was entirely extinguished by applying against it the losses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Houghton v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API