Dailey v. Dailey
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Dissent
I do not deem it important to enter into a very extensive discussion on the question decided in the majority opinion. The law books are replete, tersely and accurately expressing the opinion that where there is substantial evidence in the record supporting the judgment of the trial court, it is the duty of appellate courts to affirm the judgment.
The record in this case reveals that the trial court appointed three disinterested persons, to wit, M. F. White, a real estate man; J. G. Marrow, a real estate man, and John R. West, Jr., the county surveyor of Dallas county, Tex., to partition the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. DilworthTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Long v. GarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Compton v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Blair v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.