Legal Opinion · Dissent
Rist v. Andersen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 12, 1945No. File No. 8768Published
1DissentSmith, Presiding Judge
I am unable to concur in the holding that a partial redemption by a mortgagor or “judgment debtor” under SDC 37.3010 does not- extend the period of redemption for the benefit of a “redemptioner.” The statute is remedial and should receive a liberal construction. Muller v. Harrison, 46 S. D. 295, 192 N. W. 750. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Muller v. HarrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923