Legal Opinion
Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 2003No. 01-2139PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. (on motion for reconsideration). Firstar Bank moves the court to reconsider ¶ 35 of its opinion in Schmitz v. Firstar Bank Milwaukee, 2003 WI 21, 260 Wis. 2d 24, 658 N.W.2d 442, asserting that a portion of the language is unnecessary to the holding and contrary to the law of commercial banking in the State of Wisconsin. Firstar Bank does not ask the court to reconsider its holding.
¶ 2. Paragraph 35 of the Schmitz opinion reads as follows:
While it appears clear that accepting a check when the payee's endorsement is missing is not in accordance with the reasonable commercial standards of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perini Corp. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Great American Insurance Companies v. American State Bank of DickinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Mid-Atlantic Tennis Courts, Inc. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Schmitz v. Firstar Bank MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mills v. U.S. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Matson Intermodal System, Inc. v. Kubis Enterprises, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005