Legal Opinion
William T. Divane, Jr. v. Krull Electric Co., Inc., and Lee Electric Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 20, 1999No. 98-2095PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to a fraudulent conveyance action, Lee Electric Co. was served with a motion for turnover of its assets, which it met with a motion to quash. The district court’s grant of the motion for turnover and denial of the motion to quash are the bases for this appeal, which continues a sad history of “piecemeal litigation” that Judge Lindberg called “an embarrassment of the judicial system.” On appeal, Lee Electric Co. claims that it was denied due process by the district court’s failure to allow it to supplement its motion to quash with further motions and appeals the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cheryl A. Gile v. United Airlines, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- In the Matter of Douglas R. Prince and Jane Prince, Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Sergio Moro and Kahuna, Incorporated, an Indiana Corporation v. Shell Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Cool Fuel, Incorporated v. William H. Connett, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- United States v. Zoila MelgarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Earl WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. HomaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Scott v. BenderDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Hanley v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.