Hamill v. Jalonick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Canadian County. Action commenced in Canadian county district court by Isaac Jalonick Jr. against Robert M. Hamill, to recover possession of property held by Hamill under a lease from Jalonick. Judgment below for Jalonick Hamill brings up the case. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Daee, C. J.:
This case was commenced in the district court of Canadian county April 7, 1893, and an answer by a general denial was filed April 18, 1893. It was brought as a suit in ejectment under art. 12, cb. 70, Code of 1890, and was for the recovery of lot No. 16, in block 81, in the city of El Reno. October 24, 1891, Jalonick executed to Hamill a written lease for a building 20x40 feet, located upon the above described property, for the period of one year, at a monthly rental of 840. The lease was signed by both parties. In the body of the lease it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nelson v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Huffman v. StarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Bethell v. McCoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Frakes v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. HounWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Young v. SeverySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Young v. Severy, AssigneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Purdy v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Tuell v. HomannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.