Legal Opinion

Central Bank v. Hickey

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 13, 1996No. 15384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

This appeal requires us to decide whether No. 92-215 of the 1992 Public Acts (P.A. 92-215),1 which *780extends to individual retirement accounts (IRAs) the exemption from attachment and execution established by § 3 of No. 91-239 of the 1991 Public Acts (P.A. 91-239),2 exempts certain IRAs owned by the named defendant, Bernard J. Hickey (defendant), from the claims of the substitute plaintiff, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (plaintiff). The plaintiffs predecessor in interest, Central Bank, commenced this action seeking damages for the defendant’s default on a promissory note and,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bradbury v. WodjenskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. Fdic v. 645 Poquonock Ave. Assc., No. Cv 94 0536318 S (Mar. 25, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
  3. In re ColeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API