Legal Opinion
United States v. Cody
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided February 13, 1997No. IP 94-1918-C H/GPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT CHARLES CODY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendant Charles A. Cody has moved for summary judgment on the government’s claim to set aside as a fraudulent conveyance Cody’s transfer of his home on March 1, 1984, to his daughter, who was then one year old. As the parties have framed the issue, if the government’s action to set aside the conveyance as fraudulent is governed by the federal statute of limitations in 26 U.S.C. § 6502(a)(1), then it is timely. If the action is governed by the now-repealed statute of limitations in Ind.Code § 32-2-1-14…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Tabor Court Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States v. Randolph C. Fernon, Jr., Etc. And Susanna F. FernonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. VellalosDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peter J. Bresson (Transferee),petitioner-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alberts v. HCA Inc. (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. I)District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Bresson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1998
- United States v. NemecekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- United States v. ParadiseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.