Legal Opinion
On Yuen Hai Co. v. Ross
United States Circuit Court
Decided November 22, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Equity. Suit lor injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
Deady, D. J.
This suit is brought by a Chinese firm of this city called On Yuen Hai Company, composed of four persons whose names are given in the bill, and 16 other such firms, composed of one or moro persons each, to restrain the defendant Sears, as sheriff of Multnomah county, and the defendant Boss, as supervisor of road district No. 8 therein, from collecting from them or the Oregon Railway & Navigation Company, by seizure and sale of their goods and chattels, or otherwise, the sum of four dollars per head, claimed by said defendants to be due from each of 1,449 Chinese laborers in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Town of Pleasant v. KostIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
- Overseers of the Poor of Amenia v. Overseers of StanfordNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Town of Starksboro v. Town of HinesburghSupreme Court of Vermont · 1841
- Fox v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- McCormick v. DrummettNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- Corwin Consultants, Inc. v. The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., Samuel A. Culbertson, Ii, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. HedenskoyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Corwin Consultants, Inc. v. The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., Samuel A. Culbertson, Ii, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Newman v. United States ex rel. FrizzellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915