Legal Opinion
Grannis & Sloan, Inc., and Contractors MacHinery Company v. Renegotiation Board
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 12, 1961No. 8122PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.
By this proceeding a contractor seeks review of a determination of the Tax Court that it realized $75,000 of excess profits from renegotiable business in its fiscal year ending December 31, 1952. We must dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.
By § 403(e) (1) of the Renegotiation Act of 1942, 1 Congress expressly provided that the Tax Court of the United States should “have exclusive jurisdiction, by order, to finally determine the amount, if any, of such excessive profits received * * * by the contractor * * *, and such determination shall not be reviewed or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. California Eastern Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- U. S. Electrical Motors, Inc. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Lowell Wool By-Products Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Stimson, Secretary of WarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Eastern MacHinery Co. v. Under Secretary of WarCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The Boeing Company, Formerly Boeing Airplane Company v. The Renegotiation Board of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Equipment, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Metallurgical, Inc. v. The Renegotiation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967