Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Partheniades v. Shaughnessy

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 5, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This matter, brought up by the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus, presents the question of whether the denial to relators of suspension of deportation by the Attorney General acting through his subordinates constitutes an abuse of his discretion.

The undisputed facts show that the relators, husband, wife and minor son, are citizens of Greece. They have resided continuously in the United States since their admission at New York on September -23, 1947, as transients until October 28, 1947. A daughter was born to Mr. and Mrs. Partheniades in this country on May…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Duckworth v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States Ex Rel. Kaloudis v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  4. United States v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. Arakas v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Exarchou v. MurffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Keh Tong Chen v. Attorney General of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  3. United States Ex Rel. Paktorovics v. MurffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Dong Hyung Lee v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Dong Hyung Lee v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API