Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dennison v. Jack

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1983No. 15733, 15732APublished

1DissentMcGRAW, Chief Justice

I cannot agree with the result reached by the majority. First, the failure of the statutory foreclosure scheme embodied in the provisions of Chapter 38, article 1 to provide the grantor an opportunity to be heard prior to sale violates due process. The “state action” which the majority finds lacking clearly appears on the face of these statutes. W.Va.Code § 38-1-3 and 38-1-4 provide for the sale of property conveyed by a deed of trust after personal service of notice of the sale upon the defaulting grantor. In the absence of contrary provisions in the trust deed, the provisions of Chapter 38,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BoydWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Payne v. WaldenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. White v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  4. State v. MollohanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Russell v. Webster Springs National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API