Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1923No. 11237PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

Plaintiff has assigned numerous errors in his petition in er ror in this caso, but, under the view taken by this court, it will only be necessary to discuss the first of these assignments, which reads, “The judgment was contrary to the law.”

In the case out of which this proceeding arose, the defendant here represented the defendant in the original action, Joe McCormick. McCormick was in possession of the land in controversy, claiming title thereto. Robert Holloway brought the original action against Joe McCormick to cancel the deed under which McCormick held, upon the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Warren v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  2. Adcock v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. United States ex rel. Warren v. IckesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API