Legal Opinion
In re American Dental Laser, Inc. Securities Litigation
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 3, 1993No. Master File No. 92-CV-71917-DTPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UNDERWRITERS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PROPOSED CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AS INADEQUATE
ROSEN, District Judge.
The instant matter comes before the Court on Defendant Underwriters’ April 19, 1993 motion to dismiss class representatives as inadequate. The Court has reviewed said motion and Plaintiffs’ May 3, 1993 response, and pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) will decide the dispute without a hearing.
Defendants argue that the proposed class representatives demonstrate “alarming unfamiliarity” with the underlying facts of the litigation and grant “unfettered discretion” over the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 451, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,741 John Senter, Cross-Appellee v. General Motors Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Pedro Gonzales v. Clifton W. Cassidy, Jr., John Richard Hayes, Iii, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Lewis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Berrybrook Farms, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garrish v. United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Harrington v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2004