Legal Opinion

Illinois v. Wardlow

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 2000No. 98-1036PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

528 U.S. 119 (2000)

ILLINOIS

v.

WARDLOW

No. 98-1036.

United States Supreme Court.

Argued November 2, 1999.

Decided January 12, 2000.

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS

Rehnquist, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined, post, p. 126.

Richard A. Devine argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were James E. Ryan, Attorney General of Illinois, Joel D. Bertocchi, Solicitor General, Renee G.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Com. v. Jackson, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  2. Com. v. Barnes, Q.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. Garcia, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Correll Thomas v. C. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API