Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Wilber

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The plaintiff, a beauty shop operator, brought this action against the defendant for damages for an alleged slander, setting forth two causes of action in the first of which she asked for both general and special damages. The second cause is for an alleged trespass.

In her first cause of action, plaintiff alleges that defendant, in her shop and in the presence of other parties, published and declared of and to the plaintiff that she was a “dirty, low-down bootlegger,” meaning that plaintiff was engaged in the traffic and illicit sale of intoxicating liquors. At the same time and place…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. StarrettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
  2. Quigley v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Cheatham v. PattersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grubb v. JOHNSONOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Benassi v. Georgia-PacificCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API