Legal Opinion

Wayne Merkley v. State of Idaho

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 25, 2015No. 15-35087UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Idaho ■ state prisoner Wayne Douglas Merkley appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional claims and claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1284 (9th Cir.2015). We reverse and remand.

The district court denied Merkley’s motion to proceed IFP because it concluded that Merkley did not make a sufficient showing of indigency.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trenton v. Carmax, IncDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API