Heritage Engineering Construction, Inc. v. City of Industry
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff Heritage Engineering Construction, Inc., appeals from the judgment and postjudgment orders denying it costs and awarding costs to defendants City of Industry and Industry Urban Development Agency (collectively the City). The City appeals from the postjudgment orders denying it attorney’s fees and awarding attorney’s fees to Heritage. In the published portion of this opinion, we conclude the 1997 amendment to Code of Civil Procedure section 998, which became effective while this appeal was pending, is applicable to this case. We conclude further that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Coast Bank v. HolmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Bodell Construction Co. v. Trustees of the California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Kelly v. Choon YeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Duale v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Mesa Forest Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Greene v. Dillingham Construction N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.