Legal Opinion
Honeywell International Inc. v. Nikon Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 4, 2009No. C.A. 04-1337-JJFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion For Summary Judgment Of Invalidity Based On The On Sale Bar (D.I.771) filed by Defendants Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Fujifilm Corporation and Fujifilm U.S.A. Inc. (collectively, the “Manufacturer Defendants”). For the reasons discussed, the Court has granted the Motion. 1
I. BACKGROUND
This is an action for patent infringement brought by Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc. (collectively, “Honeywell”) against the Manufacturer Defendants and others for infringement of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Allen Engineering Corporation v. Bartell Industries, Inc. And Darragh CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- LEADER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Orbis Corp. v. Rehrig Pacific Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013