Legal Opinion

Heard v. Heard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 7, 1986No. 85-115Published

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from summary judgment in favor of the defendants in plaintiffs’ action to contest the will of the parties’ father, Murphy Anderson Heard. We affirm.

Plaintiffs (James Hubert Heard, William David Heard, Elmer Dean Heard, Alton Eugene Heard, Mildred Odell Bishop, Ina Cathleen Marberry, Marjorie Jones, and Opal Joyce Hereford) and defendants (Harvel Anderson Heard and Lola Mae Ferguson) are the surviving children of Murphy Anderson Heard, deceased, and the sole beneficiaries named in his last will and testament executed April 18, 1983, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Arrington v. Working Woman's HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Berryhill v. Mutual of Omaha Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Windham v. PopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API