People ex rel. Vivekanathan
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Dissent
JUDGE HAWTHORNE,
dissenting.
Because I conclude that the issues raised in this appeal are capable of repetition while evading review, and therefore not moot, I dissent.
I. Mootness
Generally, Colorado courts invoke their judicial power only when an actual controversy exists between adverse parties. Trinidad Sch. Dist, No. 1 v. Lopez, 963 P.2d 1095, 1102 (Colo.1998); accordPeople v. Back, 2018 COA 114, ¶10, - P.3d -, 2013 WL 8948162; Grossman v. Dean, 80 P.8d 952, 960 (Colo. App.20083). If such a controversy no longer exists, or if the relief granted by a court would have no practical effect upon…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cloverleaf Kennel Club, Inc. v. Colorado Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Goedecke v. State, Dept. of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Simpson v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.