Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Norman L. Haymer

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1993No. 92-7585Published

1DissentPolitz, Chief Judge

The majority suggests that Haymer went to a penal farm of his own accord or for contempt as a result of his failure to pay a fine. Apart from the speculation of a probation officer, I find no evidence in the record of either and, in any event, perceive no controlling significance in those conclusions, absent evidence that the punishment ultimately assessed was independent of the conviction we now review. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

The sixth amendment provides: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” That…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API