Legal Opinion

Meacham Contracting Co. v. Kleiderer

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 25, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Henderson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

Under an ordinance passed by the common council- of the city of Henderson, the appellant company improved the sidewalk abutting on property of appellee. After-wards it brought this equitable action against appellee to enforce its lien upon his property to satisfy the cost of the improvement. A recovery was resisted upon the ground that the ordinance authorizing the improvement was void, first: Because the special meeting of the council at which it had its second reading and final passage was not legally called; and second, because the ordinance on *443…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bloomfield v. Charter Oak BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hayden v. NoyesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824
  3. Reuter v. Meacham Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  5. McNulty v. ToofCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pure Milk Producers & Distributors Ass'ns v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Municipio de Hatillo v. Ríos FerrerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
  3. Pueblo v. OliverasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
  4. Town of Kevil v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Brown v. TurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API