Legal Opinion
Stalcup v. Bolt
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 4, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKemp, J.
This is a suit on a note executed by defendant and payable to plaintiff, or order, dated October 26, 1936, and in the .principal amount of $900. The balance alleged to be due thereon was $690, for which sum, together with interest and attorneys’ fees, plaintiff prayed judgment.
Defendant filed the following answer:
"Now comes the above named defendant and for his answer to the above named petition of plaintiff admits an execution of the note sued on and described in said petition but denies plaintiff owns said note and any obligation to pay the said note for the following reasons:
"The said note…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. HammerleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Jones v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
- Perry v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
- Skeen v. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ross v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942