Legal Opinion

Duncan (Matrell) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2014No. 65013Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

entered. Appellant does not assert that the order clarifying the probation revocation order is independently appealable. The notice of appeal was filed in the district court on February 12, 2014, almost 18 months after the order for revocation of probation and amended judgment of conviction was filed in the district court. The notice of appeal was thus filed well after the 30-day appeal period provided by NRAP 4(b)(1)(A). Appellant cites no authority in support of, and we reject, his argument that the clarification order restarted the appeal period. To the extent appellant contends that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Castillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Lozada v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. SCHWABACHER AND CO. v. ZobristNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  5. Moore v. North American Van LinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API