Legal Opinion

United States v. Blake

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 14, 2016No. 14-CR-98 (05) (YM)Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge

The Court has received motions in lh mine from the Government and defendant Melissa Blake (“Blake”) pertaining to the trial in the matter of United States v. Melissa Blake.1

The Government moves (1) to introduce statements made by-Blake to law enforcement officers before and after her arrest as statements of an opposing party under Federal Rule of Evidence (“FRE”) 801(d)(2), and (2) to preclude Blake from offering certain statements of her own made to law enforcement on the grounds that they constitute inadmissible hearsay pursuant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. Hugo Marin and Virgilio Orlando RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Tyrone Walker, Walter Diaz, A/K/A Eric Rogers, and Anthony Walker, A/K/A Tony WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API