Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1997No. 96-2370PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its journal entry, which is appended hereto.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee vs. Jeffrey D. Hill, Defendant-Appellant.

No. C-920497

Entry Denying Application for Reopening.

This cause came on to be considered upon the application of defendant-appellant Jeffrey D. Hill for reopening the appeal wherein judgment was entered by this court in State v. Hill (Dec. 22, 1993), Hamilton App. No. C-920497,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. George T. Franklin, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API