Griggs v. Nadeau
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota; Page Morris, Judge. Action by E. E. Nadeau against Clarence Griggs and William W. Nash. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
YOUMANS, District Judge.
The facts in tfeio case are not different from those stated in Griggs v. Nadeau, 221 Fed. 381, 137 C. C. A. 189. In that case defendant in error had recovered judgment against plaintiffs in error as executors. That judgment was reversed by this court on the ground that the law and testimony did not warrant a judgment against them as executors. It was stated in the opinion that, if the plaintiffs in error were liable at all, they were liable as individuals.
*782In the case of In re Griggs et al., 227 Fed. 795, 142 C. C. A. 319, this court refused an application for a writ of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Doyle v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lucas v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Hutchinson v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919