Legal Opinion

Pangelinan v. Itaman

Supreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands

Decided July 10, 1996No. Appeal No. 95-013; Civil Action No. 92-1076PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Chief Justice:

¶1 This is the second time this matter has been before us. Appellants, Juliana Itaman and four other heirs to the estate of Vicente Uol, appeal a judgment against them in the Superior Court on remand from this Court. Our instructions on remand called for further fact-finding on whether a series of conveyances between appellee, John S. Pangelinan, and members of his family effectively foreclosed Mr. Pangelinan’s efforts to enforce a contract he entered into with appellants regarding LotNo. E.A. 222 on Saipan. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 1 CMC § 3102(a). We affirm.

ISSU…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Skowhegan Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Weiser v. EkreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McManus v. PatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. RiosSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API