Kurt M. Jachmann Co. v. Hartley, Cooper & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DAWSON, District Judge.
This is a motion to vacate plaintiff’s notices to take the depositions of certain defendants. It is undisputed that these defendants are British subjects residing in England, and that their places of business are in England. The notices of examination would require them to appear for oral examination at the United States Courthouse in New York City. The proper place for taking the oral deposition of individual defendants is their residence, or of corporate defendants, their principal place of business. I think the plaintiff’s purpose would be adequately served at this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Isbrandsten v. MollerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Ciunci, Inc. v. LoganSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
- Deep South Oil Co. of Texas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Trehan v. Von TarkanyiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Buryan v. Max Factor & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.