Legal Opinion
United States v. James Daniel Good Property Titled in the Name of James Daniel Good
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 24, 1992No. 90-16636PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
This appeal challenges the civil forfeiture of a home pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7),1 the provision of the Controlled Substance Act that authorizes the forfeiture of real property. James Daniel Good challenged the forfeiture as untimely and as a violation of due process. The district court, exercising jurisdiction under 21 U.S.C. § 881(b), granted the government’s motion for summary judgement. The district court found the action to be timely and in accordance with due process. Notice of Appeal was filed in compliance with Fed.R.App.P. 4(a). Our jurisdiction is based…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. 4492 South Livonia RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. 5443 Suffield Terrace, Skokie, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- J. Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Freeman, Atkins & Coleman, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Real Property Located at Incline VillageDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1997
- United States v. Certain Real PropertyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.