Legal Opinion

White v. Lapp

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided July 1, 1896Published

1Opinion of the CourtHollister, J.

White, as administrator of the estate of a deceased owner of real estate, sought a sale thereof in the probate court to pay debts. Such proceedings were had that on June, 8, 1895, the order for sale was returned and filed. On the same day the administrator, as plaintiff, filed a motion to confirm the sale. On June 8, defendants filed a motion to vacate the sale. And on June 22 an order was made confirming the sale. This order was the last step in the proceedings, as shown by the transcript which was filed July 2.

Apparently no excejition was taken to the order of June 27.

The defendants filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sheets v. Selden's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Palmer v. OakleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Savings and Loan Society v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Prince v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  5. Strong v. BirchardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1824

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API