Legal Opinion

Forster v. Ulman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.

The appellant alleges, in his bill, that he together with Alfred J. Ulmán, Charles Goldsborough, and William T. Goldsborough composed the firm of “Ulman, Golds-borough and Forster,” which was engaged in the wholesale liquor business in Baltimore City. He charges that the firm dissolved on the 30th of April, 1882, and by agreement of dissolution, filed as part of his bill, Alfred J. Ulman was made the settling partner, and that he has collected moneys due the partnership, and refuses to pay him his due proportion thereof; that, with the concurrence of Charles Goldshorough and Wm. T.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Citizens' Trust & Deposit Co. v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API