Phillips v. State

Townsend, Judge.

1. (a) In Estes v. State, 98 Ga. App. 521 (106 S. E. 2d 405), where the lottery indictment contained nine counts, differing only in date, which was specified as an essential averment of each count, the case was reversed, this court holding (p. 522): “The evidence here fails to show from which future publication the prize numbers were to be selected for the chances .sold on behalf of the defendant. Had it shown a separate publication from which the prize number would be selected: as to each count in the indictment, and had it shown that chances were sold on behalf of the…