Clark v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurrence
Jo un A. Eooleman, Justice.
I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion on the basis of my understanding of the disposition being made. As I understand the majority opinion, the court is remanding the case with the state having the option of asking the trial court to sentence Clark upon a charge of carnal abuse, or of having a new trial on the charge of rape with the court giving the instruction on rape given at the first trial and the instruction on carnal abuse as requested. The only prejudice 1 can see in the court’s instruction to the jury on the second trial is that it…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- People v. JohnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- State v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. BaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Terry Dairy Co. v. NalleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.