Legal Opinion

United States v. Barron

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 25, 1996No. A91-0115 CR (JKS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Motion to Vacate Sentence and Conviction

SINGLETON, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and in reliance on Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995), William Scott Barron, Jr., seeks post-conviction relief from his conviction and sentencing for various drug offenses. Docket No. 76. The United States Magistrate Judge, to whom this matter was initially referred, recommends that the motion be granted. Docket No. 85. This Court has reviewed the record de novo and has exercised its independent judgment. It concludes that Barron should be permitted to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. James Mandell LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997
  5. United States v. RansomDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API