Schley v. Pullman Car Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO TOE CIRCUIT COURT OR TOE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OR ILLINOIS. . Ejectment. Píea, general' issue: Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff sued out this writ of error. The case is stated in the ■opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
delivered .the opinion of the court.
This is an action of ejectment, in which the plaintiff in error claims -title to certain real estate in Cook County, Illinois, of which Pullman’s Palace Car Company is in possession. A' jury having been waived, the case was tried by the court, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, that judgment should be entered for the defendant if the court was of opinion that a certain deed was valid and binding as a conveyance by husband and wife of the real estate therein described.
The deed and the certificate of acknowledgment annexed thereto, referred to in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McCormick v. SullivantSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Howland v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Clark v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Higgins v. CrosbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- In Re BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Boswell v. First National Bank of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Helen Smith Nelson, of Arthur E. Nelson, Deceased v. Swing-A-Way Manufacturing Company, a Corporation, and Idus L. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Glenn N. HEFNER, Etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.