Frost v. Duncan
New York Supreme Court
MOTION by the plaintiff, for a new trial, upon exceptions taken at the circuit. The plaintiff was nonsuited on the trial.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
S. B. Strong, J.
The 'complaint contains but one count. It sets forth that the defendants wrongfully entered upon the plaintiff’s land, felled the trees and timber standing and growing thereon, burned the same into coal, and converted such coal to their own use. Confessedly, the land was in the actual possession of the defendants, who claimed it under a deed executed about seventeen years before the perpetration of the alleged wrongs. The charges for a wrongful entry and felling the wood and timber were for injuries to the land; and at common law could not have been sustained,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schermerhorn v. BuellNew York Supreme Court · 1847
3Cited by8 opinions
- New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- McGonigle v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Winchester v. City of Stevens PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Hotchkiss v. Auburn & Rochester Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Freer v. StotenburNew York Supreme Court · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.