Hagan v. Pratt
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Charles Mix County; Hon. R. B. Tripp, Judge. Action by W. A. Hagan against C. W. Pratt and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Appellant cited: Baker v. 'Chester Gas Co., 73 Pa. St. 116; Wolf v. Holton ('Mich.), 75 N. W. 762; Lazerlere v. Starkweather, 38 Mich. 104. Respondent cited: Gillespie v. ‘Smith, 29 111. 473, 81 Am.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Charles Mix County; Hon. R. B. Tripp, Judge. Action by W. A. Hagan against C. W. Pratt and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Appellant cited: Baker v. 'Chester Gas Co., 73 Pa. St. 116; Wolf v. Holton ('Mich.), 75 N. W. 762; Lazerlere v. Starkweather, 38 Mich. 104. Respondent cited: Gillespie v. ‘Smith, 29 111. 473, 81 Am. Dec. 328; W'illard v. Finnegan, 42 Minn. 476, 44 N. W. 985; Benton Land Co. v. Zeitler, 182 Mo. 25.1, 81 S. W. 374; Givens v. McCray, 196 Mo. 306, 93 S. E. 374; Bailey v. Hendrickson, 25. N. D. 500, 143 N. W. 134.
1Opinion of the CourtGate'S, J.
The question raised on this appeal is as to- the validity of a sale of real estate under mortgage foreclosure by advertisement. Section 2883,, Rev. Code 1919', reads as follows:
“If the mortgaged premises consist of distinct farms’,' tracts- or lots, they must be sold separately, and no more farm-s, tracts or lots must be sold than shall be necessary to satisfy the amount due on such mortgage at the date of the notice of sale, with interest, and the costs and expenses allowed by law.”
The mortgage in question was a fourth mortgage. The three-prior mortgages aggregated $19,000. The second and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Connor v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- O'Connor v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Nelson v. CasparySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
- Johnson v. Dakota National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Conrad v. CarpenterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- James Valley Bank v. NicholasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926