Legal Opinion

Bernhard v. Murphy

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided June 23, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This action arises out of an assault and battery upon the plaintiff, James Bernhard (“Bernhard”).

Defendant Colin Murphy (“Murphy”) punched Bernhard in his college dormitory for no apparent reason other than Murphy’s consumption of an excessive amount of alcohol. Bernhard’s parents brought this suit on his behalf to recover damages for what was alleged in the complaint as a “negligent’ assault and battery. After trial, the judge found Murphy liable for an intentional assault and battery. Murphy filed a motion to vacate the courts judgment, and Bernhard responded with a motion to amend to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. Starr v. FordhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  4. Castellucci v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  5. Rood v. NewbergMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trustees of Watermill Place Condominium Trust v. StevensMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API